Conquest or Rush? [Archive] - The Mess Hall - The Home of Mindless Banter

Rob

Mar 27th, 2010, 10:05 PM

This isn't really about the server at all, just about BC2 in general.

What do you prefer, Conquest or Rush? Personally, I really really prefer Rush. I find Conquest a little boring.

SwedeIndeed

Mar 27th, 2010, 10:08 PM

I like the one where you blow up those boxes

Face

Mar 27th, 2010, 10:22 PM

I enjoy both.

Zirconium Blade

Mar 27th, 2010, 10:25 PM

Conquest is terrible. 90% of people don't know how to play it and cap and run to the next one.

Rush and Squad Rush is where its at.

President Shrub

Mar 27th, 2010, 10:37 PM

Rush is better. Advancing spawns and narrowed objectives turns less populated servers into intense firefights. Conquest is just a gagglefuck.

http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/5881/marxh.jpghttp://img534.imageshack.us/img534/5881/marxh.jpghttp://img534.imageshack.us/img534/5881/marxh.jpghttp://img534.imageshack.us/img534/5881/marxh.jpghttp://img534.imageshack.us/img534/5881/marxh.jpg

Verhaden

Mar 28th, 2010, 06:46 AM

I've gotten a lot better, but for the longest time I didn't know what the fuck in Conquest. Even to this day, I'll spend like 20 minutes in a game and see like... 5 people on the other team. Meh.

Miasmatic

Mar 28th, 2010, 10:15 PM

Conquest is basically deathmatch with flags, but I still enjoy it. Rush on the other hand actually has an objective.

Rob

Mar 29th, 2010, 04:12 AM

Conquest is basically deathmatch with flags, but I still enjoy it. Rush on the other hand actually has an objective.
Yes....we know what the game modes are :doh::D

The Good King Bad

Mar 29th, 2010, 04:51 AM

Conquest is far too complicated for most BC2 players.

Das-W00t

Mar 29th, 2010, 04:55 AM

Conquest is far too complicated for most BC2 players.

Clearly. As 7 THM guys can roll a 32 player server.

Rob

Mar 29th, 2010, 04:58 AM

Yeah but we're uncommonly awesome.

The Good King Bad

Mar 29th, 2010, 04:59 AM

I_raq_your_World: how did we lose so bad
I_raq_your_World: oh TMH

Jibba-Jabba

Mar 29th, 2010, 05:01 AM

I THOUGHT YOU WENT TO SLEEP

Rob

Mar 29th, 2010, 05:02 AM

I_raq_your_World: how did we lose so bad
I_raq_your_World: oh TMH
Ha! I got a knife kill on that guy.

/smug satisfaction

Fenris Wolf

Mar 29th, 2010, 04:14 PM

Conquest is far too complicated for most BC2 players.

Which is kinda sad, because conquest has been what Battlefield IS since sometime in the 40's.

Rush is way better, though I was always a fan of the Titan mode from 2142.

EMBAR

Mar 30th, 2010, 10:57 PM

Conquest is better if you get two competent teams. Otherwise, I agree, it's terrible.

Rush, on the other hand, is good 24/7.

PrivateParts

Mar 31st, 2010, 06:40 AM

I like both.

Like rush a bit more since a good squad can typically control the outcome of the round.

Its harder on conquest. A good squad can hold down a point thats getting hammered all round and then look at the scoreboard and see they are losing by 30 tickets because the rest of the team cant hold another point against 60% of the enemy team not distracted.