PDA

View Full Version : Student vs. John Ashcroft



Rob
Apr 26th, 2008, 05:16 AM
Recently the ex-AG visited Knox College at the behest of its Republican organization, with rather expected results given that it's a thoroughly liberal college. That said, however, I did find his stammering and belligerence following one student's questioning to be rather telling.


STUDENT: First off, Mr. Ashcroft, I'd like to apologize for the rudeness of some of my fellow students. It was uncalled for--we can disagree civilly, we don't need that. (round of applause from the audience, and Ashcroft smiles) I have here in my hand two documents. One of them, you know, is the text of the United Nations Convention against Torture, which, point of interest, says nothing about "lasting physical damage"...

ASHCROFT: (interrupting) Do you have the Senate reservations to it?

STUDENT: No, I don't. Do you happen to know what they are?

ASHCROFT: (angrily) I don't have them memorized, no. I don't have time to go around memorizing random legal facts. I just don't want these people in the audience to go away saying, "He was wrong, she had the proof right in her hand!" Because that's not true. It's a lie. If you don't have the reservations, you don't have anything. Now, if you want to bring them another time, we can talk, but...

STUDENT: Actually, Mr. Ashcroft, my question was about this other document. (laughter and applause) This other document is a section from the judgment of the Tokyo War Tribunal. After WWII, the Tokyo Tribunal was basically the Nuremberg Trials for Japan. Many Japanese leaders were put on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity, including torture. And among the tortures listed was the "water treatment," which we nowadays call waterboarding...

ASHCROFT: (interrupting) This is a speech, not a question. I don't mind, but it's not a question.

STUDENT: It will be, sir, just give me a moment. The judgment describes this water treatment, and I quote, "the victim was bound or otherwise secured in a prone position; and water was forced through his mouth and nostrils into his lungs and stomach." One man, Yukio Asano, was sentenced to fifteen years hard labor by the allies for waterboarding American troops to obtain information. Since Yukio Asano was trying to get information to help defend his country--exactly what you, Mr. Ashcroft, say is acceptible for Americans to do--do you believe that his sentence was unjust? (boisterous applause and shouts of "Good question!")

ASHCROFT: (angrily) Now, listen here. You're comparing apples and oranges, apples and oranges. We don't do anything like what you described.

STUDENT: I'm sorry, I was under the impression that we still use the method of putting a cloth over someone's face and pouring water down their throat...

ASHCROFT: (interrupting, red-faced, shouting) Pouring! Pouring! Did you hear what she said? "Putting a cloth over someone's face and pouring water on them." That's not what you said before! Read that again, what you said before!

STUDENT: Sir, other reports of the time say...

ASHCROFT: (shouting) Read what you said before! (cries of "Answer her fucking question!" from the audience) Read it!

STUDENT: (firmly) Mr. Ashcroft, please answer the question.

ASHCROFT: (shouting) Read it back!

STUDENT: "The victim was bound or otherwise secured in a prone position; and water was forced through his mouth and nostrils into his lungs and stomach."

ASHCROFT: (shouting) You hear that? You hear it? "Forced!" If you can't tell the difference between forcing and pouring...does this college have an anatomy class? If you can't tell the difference between forcing and pouring...

STUDENT: (firmly and loudly) Mr. Ashcroft, do you believe that Yukio Asano's sentence was unjust? Answer the question. (pause)

ASHCROFT: (more restrained) It's not a fair question; there's no comparison. Next question! (loud chorus of boos from the audience)

Up until that point of the article I actually felt kind of sorry for the guy, agreeing to appear in a place so obviously hostile to him. The above exchange though, that sympathy kind of evaporated...

Full story (warning, Daily Kos) (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/23/04046/3938/224/501151)

CrazyTalk
Apr 26th, 2008, 07:09 AM
wow what an asshat

RichyCunningham
Apr 26th, 2008, 08:42 AM
That's actually one of the more entertaining things I've read in my entire life.

I wish that entire Q&A was typed up...

Invig
Apr 28th, 2008, 03:57 AM
I dont think the current water torture method actually consists of water going into the lungs and stomach. The japanese version they actually were drowning people.

Im not sure but the way its done now is the person is blind folded and then a cloth placed over there face. Water is poured over it and the feeling of the water makes people think they are going to drown but its actually just a mind fuck. Dont quote me on that though. Torture is torture.

RichyCunningham
Apr 28th, 2008, 05:32 PM
Water is in fact going in their body but what gives it the effect of drowning is the cloth. The cloth somehow manages the flow of water by restricting air (wet cloth) and the water being poured in give it a feel of drowning.

Cheeto
Apr 28th, 2008, 06:48 PM
I'm pretty sure you can drown by waterboarding if it's done improperly. Either way, this whole dicking around with 'Oh that's torture but this isn't' is getting assinine. You either torture or don't.

What a dickwad.

Dr. Crawford
Apr 28th, 2008, 09:41 PM
It is apples to oranges though. Soldiers=/=Murderers

Rob
Apr 29th, 2008, 02:04 AM
It is apples to oranges though. Soldiers=/=Murderers
I'm pretty sure if the Japanese were intending to extract information, the direct intent wasn't just to kill American soldiers. Substitute "American soldiers" and "enemy combatants" where pertinent.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...

Cheeto
Apr 29th, 2008, 02:26 PM
It is apples to oranges though. Soldiers=/=Murderers
In 50 years, Iraqis may be making the same comparison to their own troops versus ours. Even Shakespeare mentioned that 'a soldier is only a murderer to the brothers of the slain.'

Invig
Apr 29th, 2008, 11:26 PM
except its not the soldiers doing the torturing in most cases. Its DoD civilians wearing DCUs who think they are badass door kickers

Shade-of-Grey
Apr 30th, 2008, 02:55 PM
i fucking hate SDS hippies

that being said, waterboarding is fucked up.

Cheeto
Apr 30th, 2008, 08:12 PM
Just glad that he's no longer really relevant except as a litmus of the current bunch of fuckwits in the big white building.

2ltben
May 20th, 2008, 09:05 PM
I never understood the phrase "comparing apples to oranges." Anything can be correlated or analyzed if you're not completely fucking stupid. If he wasn't lying, he could have stated actual differences that wern't semantic in nature instead of shouting the word "Pouring" over and over like some sort of moron. Waterboarding is fucking horrible, but there are differences in methodology and result between that and the water cure and they're far from the same procedure, but Ashcroft was a twit and didn't say any of that. Probably because the method administered to the guy in this case wasn't anywhere near waterboarding. It was the water cure.

You shouldn't feel sorry for him. You should feel sorry for the fact that the former Attorney General couldn't come up with a simple counterpoint against an undergraduate with obvious flawed assumptions.

Penguin
May 20th, 2008, 09:07 PM
I never understood the phrase "comparing apples to oranges." Anything can be correlated or analyzed if you're not completely fucking stupid.
Yes, but it's usually meant to mean you're comparing dissimilar objects or concepts in a completely fucking stupid way. Like:

"This apple seems to be inferior to the other. It is squidgy, bumpy, and off-color."
"Dude, that's an orange."
"...oh."