He cheated on his wife, but he said (To me it seemed as if it makes it okay..) that "Well my wife was in remission"
Wow John... say bye to your career. To think I kind of respected him.
He cheated on his wife, but he said (To me it seemed as if it makes it okay..) that "Well my wife was in remission"
Wow John... say bye to your career. To think I kind of respected him.
maybe this was his way of saying "i dont want to be vice president"
He probably could have weathered it if he hadn't lied first. I mean, he still wouldn't have gotten VP nomination, but still.
When someone lies about something as simple as a premarital affair, bold face lies in front of cameras then says "Well I never said it wasn't true, I said it was 99.9% not true" or some shit.... I don't think (And doubt many Americans do) he can be trusted.Originally Posted by Rob
Cause leaders are expected to be honest?Originally Posted by Burris
And he says he is willing to take a paternity test, yet of COURSE the mistress says no.
Something called "decision making".Originally Posted by Rob
Obviously the man can not find the right type of woman to cheat on; i.e. poor decision making.
Forgive me if I find that a bit hypocritical. The entire American ethos and design of government is structured around the distrust of politicians. I don't think that applies just to the States either, but also to a lot of Western society in general; trust politicians only as far as you can throw them. Expect them to be 'honest', IMO, betrays a staggering naivety.Originally Posted by Burris
Personal life and professional life are entirely different creatures.Originally Posted by Faceman
No they're not.
Think about it, if he was willing to put his whole party in jeopardy and fully lie to a reporter.. what if he won? The Democrats would be toast.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks